Populating ros messages is slow

Madalynn asked: 2021-03-25 matlab , signal , signal processing , ros, performance

Is populating ROS messages in MATLAB slow? Discover optimization techniques and solutions to speed up your ROS message handling. Read now for faster MATLAB ROS

Expert Answer

John Williams answered . 2025-06-30 23:34:30

Hello ,

Cause of Performance Issues

Accessing Nested Messages (pre-R2020b)

Based on your other question, I assume you are using R2019a. All releases up through R2020a use rosjava under the hood, and the messages contain Java message objects. This means that as you use fields of deeply-nested messages, for either setting or getting data, MATLAB has to do several conversions of message objects.

For example, when you call :

cmdFullStateMsg.Pose.Position.X = pos(1)

then MATLAB:

Accesses the geometry_msgs/Pose Java message object from the "Pose" property
Converts that to the MATLAB robotics.ros.msggen.geometry_msgs.Pose object
Accesses geometry_msgs/Point Java message object from the "Position" property
Converts that to the MATLAB robotics.ros.msggen.geometry_msgs.Point object
Accesses the "X" property of the underlying geometry_msgs/Point Java message and assigns it to the provided value
Assigns the appropriate properties of the various objects all the way up the nested tree

Multiple Calls to rosmessage

Additionally, any call to rosmessage requires the construction of the object and its underlying Java message. Limiting the number of calls is advantageous when trying to improve performance.

Solutions

Disclaimer

The performance improvement is just what I'm seeing through casual measurement (tic-toc) on my machine in particular. You may not see the same improvement depending on your machine, resources, environment, code structure or other factors.

Extract Nested Messages Before Setting Values

When setting multiple fields in a single message that is deeply nested, it can help a lot to pull out the message manually and set the fields. Since mesage objects in MATLAB are handles, you don't need to reassign it to the nested field either.

Testing with nav_msgs/Odometry (which is similar, if not quite the same as your message), I compared running this:

m = rosmessage("nav_msgs/Odometry");
m.Pose.Pose.Position.X = 1;
m.Pose.Pose.Position.Y = 2;
m.Pose.Pose.Position.Z = 3;
m.Twist.Twist.Linear.X = 4;
m.Twist.Twist.Linear.Y = 5;
m.Twist.Twist.Linear.Z = 6;
m.Header.Stamp.Sec = 7;
m.Header.Stamp.Nsec = 8;
m.Header.FrameId = '';
m.Pose.Pose.Orientation.W = 1;
m.Pose.Pose.Orientation.X = 2;
m.Pose.Pose.Orientation.Y = 3;
m.Pose.Pose.Orientation.Z = 4;
m.Twist.Twist.Angular.X = 5;
m.Twist.Twist.Angular.Y = 6;
m.Twist.Twist.Angular.Z = 7;

To this:

m = rosmessage("nav_msgs/Odometry");
pose = m.Pose.Pose;
twist = m.Twist.Twist;
posePos = pose.Position;
poseOri = pose.Orientation;
twistLin = twist.Linear;
twistAng = twist.Angular;
head = m.Header;
posePos.X = 1;
posePos.Y = 2;
posePos.Z = 3;
twistLin.X = 4;
twistLin.Y = 5;
twistLin.Z = 6;
head.Stamp.Sec = 7;
head.Stamp.Nsec = 8;
head.FrameId = '';
poseOri.W = 1;
poseOri.X = 2;
poseOri.Y = 3;
poseOri.Z = 4;
twistAng.X = 5;
twistAng.Y = 6;
twistAng.Z = 7;</pre.

in a loop of 1000 iterations, and got about a 2X improvement with the second code. It's not ground-breaking, but it's significant enough to be worth doing.

Reuse Message Objects

A large part of this time is spent running rosmessage. If you only are using this message for immediate sending (and aren't trying to store data for later or something), and you are always overwriting the same values, you can just reuse the same message object again and again. Call rosmessage outside of the control loop and make it available to the inside in some way. Set the values on the inside and send the message. The values will remain the same when the next iteration comes up, so they'll need to all be overwritten again, but if you're doing that anyway it's not an additional cost. Testing with this method, showed an 5X improvement over the original code.

If you're going for every bit of performance possible, you can even extract all of the inner fields you're setting initially (after calling rosmessage), then pass those variables to the control loop to set. This eeked into the 6X improvement range over the original code, but it was a pretty minimal difference.

Use R2020b+

Additionally, if you combine these tips with updating to R2020b (if that is possible for you), I'm seeing around a 3X-5X improvement in control loop runtime between the two versions running the same code. This is because R2020b no longer uses a Java back-end, and so message fields are being retrieved and set directly in the MATLAB objects. Definitely create the rosmessage outside of the control still, as that nets the biggest improvement in performance.